Well-suited for openings, closings, and direct witness testimony, since the vast majority of these scenarios are well scripted and presented in order. It can be extremely effective at leading jurors through the story by presenting each document and callout in context, and deliberately focusing jurors on important segments and themes before moving on. PowerPoint is best used to tell your case story in a step-by-step style. So, what kinds of situations lend themselves to PowerPoint? When should you rely on Trial Director? This post outlines the major pros and cons of both – so you don’t have to learn through time, trial, and error. You need to know your tools in order to make a good decision. Ford comparison – more like Helicopter vs. They just have different strengths and weaknesses, better suited to some situations or presenting styles than others. 1 Neither tool is inherently better or worse than the other.
#Best presentation tool for mac software#
But when it comes to your main workhorse software, the decision is usually between general presentation software like PowerPoint, and more specialized software like Trial Director and OnCue.
As is so often the case, using the tool best suited for the situation can really make a difference in the outcome – and the wrong choice can leave you holding a stick in a sword fight.Īttorneys have a lot of options when it comes to presenting documents in the courtroom. We often get questions about what presentation software to use for presenting documents at hearings, arbitrations, and trial.
0 kommentar(er)
